| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
26/07/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
26/07/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
TSENG, C-M.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C. M. |
|
Afiliación : |
MENG-CHUN TSENG, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; IGNACIO MACEDO YAPOR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MUZIO MARELLA, Sociedad Anónima Molinos Arroceros Nacionales (SAMAN), Uruguay; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAMERON M. PITTELKOW, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. |
|
Título : |
Synergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021. |
|
Contenido : |
A major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint. MenosA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seed... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE; RICE; SUSTAINABILITY; TRADEOFFS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15908/1/Current-Research-Environmental-Sustainability-2021-3-100070.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049021000463
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02847naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1062325
005 2021-07-26
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070$2DOI
100 1 $aTSENG, C-M.
245 $aSynergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021.
520 $aA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint.
653 $aCARBON FOOTPRINT
653 $aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
653 $aNITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE
653 $aRICE
653 $aSUSTAINABILITY
653 $aTRADEOFFS
700 1 $aROEL, A.
700 1 $aMACEDO, I.
700 1 $aMARELLA, M.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aPITTELKOW, C. M.
773 $tCurrent Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
18/01/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
12/04/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
|
Autor : |
SAN JULIÁN, R.; MONTOSSI, F.; BERRETTA, E.J.; LEVRATTO, J.; ZAMIT, W.; RÍOS, M. |
|
Afiliación : |
ROBERTO SAN JULIAN SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ELBIO JOAQUIN BERRETTA CARVALLO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN CARLOS LEVRATTO CORTES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; WILFREDO SHAMIL ZAMIT DUARTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Alternativas de alimentación y manejo invernal de la recría ovina en la Región de Basalto. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
1999 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Anuario Sociedad Criadores de Merino Australiano, 1999, p. 48-56. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Thesagro : |
OVINOS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00516nam a2200169 a 4500
001 1057969
005 2018-04-12
008 1999 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSAN JULIÁN, R.
245 $aAlternativas de alimentación y manejo invernal de la recría ovina en la Región de Basalto.
260 $aAnuario Sociedad Criadores de Merino Australiano, 1999, p. 48-56.$c1999
650 $aOVINOS
700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F.
700 1 $aBERRETTA, E.J.
700 1 $aLEVRATTO, J.
700 1 $aZAMIT, W.
700 1 $aRÍOS, M.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
